What has the charity done?
Has the Hindu Religious Endowment Department done anything new with respect to income from temple lands and places?

Did all the Hindus build the biggest temple to be proud of? Or improved an existing temple?

The temple and the area may have been changed and improved with the huge income of the Palani temple, but what is happening?

How is Tirupati? How is Palani?

Tirupati income cannot be compared but Palani can definitely bring a great change in income.

But the current situation is such that we think this is okay.

Thousands of years old magnificent temples are crumbling. The organization is not concerned about this.

If this continues, the glory and history of Hinduism will be completely destroyed in the future.

Jaggi Vasudev
Presently Jaggi Vasudev is leading with the voice that the temple should be given to the people.

Many who are not direct supporters of Zakki Vasudev will accept his “stop temple slavery” proposition.

Although Zakki Vasudev is trying to live up to the expectations of many people, if he tries to project himself as a prominent figure among the Hindu masses, he will be disappointed.

Temples are neglected
If there is a coin in the temple, the Hindu religious endowment department will take control of it. This is why some temples do not have money.

The popular Pariyur Kondattuk Kaliyamman in our Gopi area has not developed after the Hindu Religious Charities Department took control.

Before that there were huge celebrations during the festival season. The government does not come forward to bear the cost of the temple.

There are lots of lands for the temple, which generate income but are not used for the temple.

The Hindu Religious Endowments Department has so far done anything constructive for the development and maintenance of Hindu temples.

The only good thing that the charity has done/is doing is the annual refresher camp for the temple elephants!

That also happened because of 'J' notification.

Censorship
In short, income from public care is higher than income from government.

So even if temples are returned to the people, censorship can be formalized.

Otherwise, it will be like going from the hands of a robber to the hands of a thief.

It is not fair to bring only temple when mosques and churches are not in this list.

They have the right to maintain their places of worship.

The government has no right and no justification to use the income generated by the temple for other purposes.

Government may take steps to regularize (audit) expenditure. Government cannot decide what to spend on.