The word correspondence has numerous implications. It is essentially a cycle of communication with individuals and their current circumstance. Through such interac­tions, at least two people impact the thoughts, convictions, and mentalities of one another. Such communications occur through the trading of data through words, signals, signs, images, and articulations. In associations, correspondence is a nonstop cycle of giving and accepting data and to fabricate social connections.  

The word 'correspondence' is gotten from the Latin word socialism, which implies normal, since regularity of comprehension is a fundamental segment of a wide range of interchanges, all the more especially in hierarchical correspondence. Without regular un­derstanding, correspondence in associations makes more misunderstand­ings and individuals may get aimless. Today, we talk about a common vision in associations. To foster a common vision, we need successful com­munication systems.  

In any event, for everyday operational issues, communi­cation assumes an incredible part in explaining questions and in putting forth the attempts of individuals result situated. What is significant for us is to comprehend that in our antiquated writings, we have sufficient reference of non-verbal correspondence be­tween man, nature, and creatures. Correspondence with nature and creatures was viewed as the most ideal approach to support learning in the Indian gurukul sys­tem of learning. In this way, correspondence is just about as old as our progress. Indeed, even in pre-civilization days, non-verbal correspondence was in presence between man, nature, and creatures.

In associations, nonetheless, language-based or verbal correspondence is more significant. With language, correspondence inside and outside the orga­nizations turned out to be significantly more successful and worldwide. With market globalization, the English language has been acknowledged as a mechanism of correspondence even by the nations like China, Japan, Russia, France, and Germany, whose considered arrangement was to discuss—while exchanging with the different coun­tries of the world—in their own dialects, yet that didn't function admirably. There­fore, with language, correspondence in associations turns out to be considerably more basic and significant.  

Definition and Concepts:  

A comprehensive meaning of correspondence is hard to grow, clearly due to its sweeping nature. Subsequently, to the degree conceivable, we will limit our endeavors to characterize correspondence in the hierarchical setting. Denis Mcquail characterized correspondence as 'an interaction which expands shared trait'. Hovland, then again, characterized it as 'a cycle by which an individual communicator sends to adjust the conduct of others'.  

Warner Weaver, going above and beyond, considers correspondence as 'the strategy by which one psyche can influence another'. As indicated by the American College Dictionary 'correspondence is the bestowing or trade of contemplations, assessments, or data by discourse, composing, or signs'. From the hierarchical perspective, thusly, correspondence has the highlights of connection, trade, sharing, and normality.  

From the above definition, we can recognize the accompanying components of correspondence:  

1. Correspondence is a two way measure. It includes a sender and a recipient. The sender or recipient can be an individual or a gathering.  

2. All correspondence conveys a message. Message can be as data, an order, an enquiry, an inclination, an assessment, a thought, or in some other structure.  

3. Correspondence can happen just when there is normality of under­standing between the sender and the recipient. The ordinariness in­cludes factors like normal culture, basic language, and basic climate. Words, phrases, colloquialisms, maxims, motions, and expres­sions are profoundly refined and have high open potential for individuals from comparative foundations.