"Godi Media" is a term that has become synonymous with media outlets perceived to be overly aligned with ruling governments, particularly in India. Coined by Indian journalist Ravish Kumar, "Godi" (which translates to "lap" in Hindi) suggests media that acts as a lapdog rather than a watchdog, prioritizing favorable coverage of the government over objective journalism. This article explores the origins of the term, its historical context, and its impact on journalism.
In pre-independence India, newspapers and journals played a pivotal role in the freedom struggle. Publications like Kesari, Amrita Bazar Patrika, and The Hindu were instrumental in questioning colonial policies and fostering a sense of nationalism. Journalism was characterized by its commitment to truth and the public good.
After independence in 1947, the Indian media assumed the role of a pillar of democracy, balancing its responsibilities between holding the government accountable and supporting nation-building. Publications like The Indian Express and The Statesman were known for their fearless journalism, particularly during crises like the Emergency (1975–1977), when the government imposed censorship.
The term "Godi Media" gained prominence in the 2010s, reflecting concerns about the increasing coziness between major media houses and the government. While the phenomenon of biased or state-friendly media is not new, its scale and visibility have grown in recent years.
A significant factor in the emergence of "Godi Media" is the consolidation of media ownership by large corporations. Many of these corporations have interests that align closely with government policies, leading to editorial decisions that avoid criticism of ruling powers. As media houses became part of larger conglomerates, the potential for conflict of interest increased.
Governments in India, both at the central and state levels, are among the largest advertisers for media houses. This economic dependence can create pressure on outlets to toe the government line. Favorable reporting ensures continued access to lucrative government advertisements.
The competition for Television Rating Points (TRPs) has pushed many channels toward sensationalism. Political controversies and government-promoted narratives often dominate airtime, sidelining critical issues like unemployment, healthcare, and education.
The advent of social media has amplified the influence of "Godi Media." Viral clips of biased reporting and government-friendly debates often spark outrage, further entrenching perceptions of partisanship.
The rise of "Godi Media" has far-reaching consequences for journalism and democratic values:
Despite the dominance of "Godi Media," independent journalism continues to thrive in pockets. Platforms like The Wire, Scroll.in, and NewsClick are known for their critical reporting and commitment to journalistic ethics. Additionally, social media has given a voice to independent journalists and citizen reporters who challenge the mainstream narrative.
Public awareness and media literacy are also on the rise, as audiences increasingly question the credibility of sources and seek diverse perspectives.
The term "Godi Media" underscores a pressing issue in contemporary journalism: the need for independence and accountability in the press. While the phenomenon reflects broader global trends of media partisanship, its impact in India is particularly significant due to the country's democratic framework and diverse population.
As journalism evolves, a conscious effort to uphold ethical standards and prioritize the public interest is essential. The future of democracy depends not just on the freedom of the press but on its willingness to exercise that freedom responsibly.
